WASHINGTON – Two of the nation’s most competitive congressional races are in Arizona, with Democrats trying to unseat seven-term Rep. David Schweikert of Fountain Hills and first-term Rep. Juan Ciscomani of Tucson.
The contests were among the Democrats’ best opportunities to pick up seats in their bid to flip control of the House, where Republicans have held a razor-thin majority.
Ciscomani’s race was a rematch against former state Sen. Kirsten Engel, who fell short by 1.5 percentage points two years ago.
Both contests were among the most expensive in the country, each attracting about $35 million at last tally, according to data from campaign finance watchdog OpenSecrets.
1st District: David Schweikert vs. Amish Shah
Schweikert’s Democratic challenger, Amish Shah – an emergency room doctor who served in the Legislature for five years – outraised the incumbent $5.7 million to $3.9 million through Oct. 24 in his bid for the Phoenix-area 1st District, according to campaign finance reports.
Each endured more than $10 million worth of attack ads from outside groups.
Republican consultant Jaime Molera said the spending reached “a threshold of so much money” that eventually it generated only “noise” for voters. He credited Arizona Democrats for being “more organized and much more well-funded” this fall.
Elected in 2010, Schweikert survived a close call in 2022. He won by just 3,000 votes – less than 1 percentage point. Six Democrats lined up in the primary for the chance to face him this year.
Democrats panned the deeply conservative Schweikert as out of step with a district where, according to Secretary of State data, independents account for a third of the electorate and Democrats for 27%.
Schweikert has long focused on fiscal responsibility and emphasized calls to reduce the nation’s debt and lower inflation.
Shah, an ER doctor at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, highlighted abortion rights and emphasized his reputation for working across partisan lines in the state House even when that disappointed fellow Democrats. He resigned from the Legislature in February to focus on his bid for Congress.
He also vowed to secure the border, boost the economy, make health care more affordable and promote education.
6th District: Juan Ciscomani vs. Kirsten Engel
Like Schweikert’s constituents, about a third of Ciscomani’s are independents.
Republicans hold less of an advantage in the 6th District, though – 36%-30% – and Engel fell short by just 5,200 votes two years ago.
Democrats hammered Ciscomani for opposing abortion rights and Proposition 139 to codify abortion rights in the state constitution.
The strategy was clearly meant to drive up Democratic turnout and to encourage Republican women to abandon him, Molera said.
Ciscomani is known as a relatively bipartisan member of a GOP conference controlled by hardliners. He ran on securing the border and fixing the economy and attacked Engel over a 2022 comment rejecting the idea that the U.S.-Mexico border was in crisis.
The focus on border security and the economy was smart, Molera said, and being “seen as a more centrist Republican has helped him a lot.” But, he said, Engel’s financial backing had “a huge impact in helping her become as competitive as she is.”
Engel, a University of Arizona law professor who served in both houses of the Legislature before turning her sights on Congress, outraised Ciscomani $7.6 million to $6.2 million, according to OpenSecrets.
Another $22 million poured into the race from outside groups, about evenly split between each side.
She emphasized reproductive rights and water rights and accused Ciscomani of being far less moderate than he wants voters to believe – citing his opposition to abortion rights and his affiliation with the Patriot Academy. That’s a Christian nationalist group that seeks to “train citizens to understand and influence government policy with a biblical worldview.”
Engel garnered the endorsement of abortion rights supporters. She was also backed by groups such as “March for Our Lives” that seek to curb gun violence.