Critics say vaccine injury fund has strayed from original purpose
Wednesday, May 20, 2015
WASHINGTON – Barbara Loe Fisher was at the table 29 years ago when the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was crafted – and she says it’s no longer living up to the “spirit and intent of Congress.”
The act was a response to vaccine manufacturers’ threats in the 1980s to pull out of the United States, after a number of lawsuits by parents who believed their children were injured by vaccines. Congress, wanting to protect the U.S. vaccine supply, created the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
The “no-fault” system for resolving vaccine injury claims ensures “a fair and expeditious system to compensate those who may have rare reactions to vaccines,” the organization said in a statement.
It was supposed to be an “expedited, less-traumatic, less-expensive alternative to the lawsuit,” resulting in the most “generous federal compensation possible,” said Fisher, the president of the National Vaccine Information Center.
It’s no longer an alternative, Fisher said, and it’s a lengthy and challenging process – that often ends without compensation.
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, signed into law in 1986, set up a number of steps to protect parents and children, while also protecting the vaccine manufacturers. This is how it’s supposed to work:
- Before a vaccination, a person is given a Vaccine Information Statement,” listing the benefits and risks of the vaccine, describing what a reaction might look like and providing information on the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program – in case of the “extremely small” risk of serious harm or death.
- If the patient has an adverse effect after getting vaccinated, the parent or doctor is expected to report it under the “Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.”
- If the injury lasts for more than six months after vaccination, results in a hospital stay or surgery, or results in death, the individual or a parent or guardian must file with the U.S. Court of Federal Claims within three years after the first symptom or two years after death.
- A lawyer is not needed to file a claim but is allowed, and most people use one to help navigate the process. The compensation program typically covers attorney’s fees, even if a person does not win their claim.
- Winning a claim requires proving a number of things: That the patient got one of the vaccines listed on the Vaccine Injury Table and that the person had an injury listed on the table as being associated with their particular vaccine.
- If the individual’s injury is not “on table,” things get more complicated. The person must prove that the vaccine caused the injury or caused an existing injury to get worse, and must prove that the injury could not have been caused by anything else. Proving causation requires medical records and expert testimony.
- If an individual wins, award amounts vary. Compensation for a death is capped at $250,000, but surviving patients will be awarded money for past and future medical expenses, as well as for pain and suffering and lost earnings.
That’s how it’s supposed to work. But in the past 27 years, some say, things have changed.
To begin, the compensation program is no longer supporting just children.
In 2005, the flu shot was added to the program, making adults eligible for compensation, as well. Since then, 71 percent of compensated claims have gone to individuals over age 18, according to officials from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
“We feel that it has not been implemented the way it should have been and we’re very, very concerned that today a majority of the compensations that are awarded are awarded to adults,” Fisher said.
The most recent vaccines added to the compensation program do not yet have any associated injuries listed “on table.” That means a longer and more challenging legal journey for petitioners because they have to prove the vaccine caused the injury, usually with extensive medical research and expert testimony.
Officials from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program said there are no on-table injuries for the newer vaccines, “because at the time they were added there were not any known associated injuries.” They said the Health Resources and Services Administration is currently considering adding injuries to the six vaccines added to the program since 1999.
Drew Downing, a Phoenix lawyer who specializes in vaccine injury cases, said a “straightforward” vaccine injury case that revolves around a vaccine on the injury table takes six to eight months to adjudicate. If a case is complicated and involves an off-table injury, it can take years.
Downing said compensation claims have become increasingly litigious, beginning about six years ago. Even when cases are fairly simple, “the government will fight,” he said.
Renee Gentry, president of the Vaccine Injured Petitioners Bar Association, said vaccine attorneys are “being held to a higher and higher standard of closer approaching scientific certainty.”
With newer vaccines, it is difficult to find literature and experts to back up claims, because after-market research on these vaccines hasn’t been completed yet, she said. But, victims still need to submit a claim within three years of the first symptom.
“If there’s no literature out there, there’s nothing you can do, but you’ve still got to go ahead and file your claim or you lose your rights,” Gentry said.
Even when you can find an expert in the field, convincing them to testify is “incredibly difficult,” Gentry said. Medical experts fear being labeled as anti-vaccine, she said.
Downing said he’s run into the same issues in his cases – most pediatricians won’t go on the record to say a vaccine triggered a reaction.
“It’s because of the stigma attached to the anti-vaccine movement,” Downing said. “They just don’t want to be associated with it in that regard.”
Gentry said the vaccine injury claim legal process is complicated and that, “it’s knock-down, drag-out fighting at every step.”
When asked about the increased difficulty of wining compensation, a Justice Department official said the standard of proof for people making an off-table claim was set by Congress and affirmed by the courts.
She also said that the law gives the Health and Human Services secretary the authority to amend the Vaccine Injury Table “as more accurate information concerning the safety of vaccines became available.”
The spokeswoman noted that “ongoing efforts to create the safest, most effective vaccines yielded new formulations that produced fewer reactions.”
That may be. But Fisher said the compensation program has become a difficult process that often ends without compensation – not at all what she thought it would be when she helped draft the law.
“Those of us that have worked on this law, we feel that it has not been implemented in the way that we certainly were promised,” Fisher said. “We’re disappointed in what’s happened.”